http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59371

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > Well that corrects how i++ is done.
> 
> Old MIPS assembly code produced was AFAICT correct.  The loop termination
> condition was expressed as:

Correctly representative in the gimple IR rather than in the final assembly.

Reply via email to