http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59371
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > > Well that corrects how i++ is done. > > Old MIPS assembly code produced was AFAICT correct. The loop termination > condition was expressed as: Correctly representative in the gimple IR rather than in the final assembly.