http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- And the problem with that is? Because the arithmetics is based on the value we've read, it shouldn't be a problem. That said, during stage3 I'll look at how costly would be to use there __atomic_load_n with MEMMODEL_RELAXED.