http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Similar to PR 53017 (does the same +0 workaround work?). The main difference with constructor seems to be a call to default_conversion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Similar to PR 53017 (does the same +0 workaround work?). The main difference with constructor seems to be a call to default_conversion.