http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > If there are no side-effects in v1 or v2, why not, but if there are > side-effects, IMHO it should act as ANDIF, not as BIT_AND_EXPR. Then I'd say leave the whole thing to gimplification. Richard.
