http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58984
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note that likely since r199252 Aggregate replacements: 0[14]=1, 0[8]=0, 0[0]=1 is replaced with just 0[0]=1, still the effect is exactly the same.
