http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58918
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bviyer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
I think the include ought to be wrapped inside an #ifdef HAVE_ALLOCA_H. That's
the core issue here -- some systems simply don't have alloca.h. So test for it
and only include it if it exists.
I agree with Joseph that XALLOCA isn't appropriate here. Even more so as GCC
is a downstream user of this library, so adding that kind of dependency simply
isn't going to fly.
