http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Dear Tobias, I cannot get to the commit until Sunday night at earliest. Thus, if you can do it, that would be great. In fact, if you do that, I'll post the fix for the hollerith nonsense on Sunday. Cheers Paul On 23 October 2013 22:57, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 > > --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #3) >> I had changed the testcase to: > > ... which is in the essential part the same. (I had a few more checks, but > those do not really matter.) > >> Is it not the case that the select type (o) is unnecessary for the test? >> That is ' if (storage_size(o) /= sz) call abort()' is all that is needed? > > For this bug, yes. But I think checking that within SELECT TYPE the correct > SIZE_OF is applied, doesn't harm. Thus, I think it is useful to have. > > I leave committing the patch to you – I think either of our versions is fine. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You are the assignee for the bug.
