http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532 > > David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|FIXED |--- > > --- Comment #10 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > > Fixed. > > Not sure. My second bootstrap still fails on revision 203101 > > ../src/trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results --enable-checking=yes > --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran > > produces > > In file included from ../../src/trunk/gcc/function.h:27:0, > from ../../src/trunk/gcc/df-scan.c:32: > ../../src/trunk/gcc/df-scan.c: In function ?void > df_ref_record.constprop(df_collection_rec*, rtx, basic_block, df_insn_info*, > df_ref_type, int)?: > ../../src/trunk/gcc/hard-reg-set.h:156:44: error: array subscript is above > array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] > (!!((SET)[(BIT) / UHOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT] \ > ^ > ../../src/trunk/gcc/df-scan.c:2824:18: note: in expansion of macro > ?TEST_HARD_REG_BIT? > > I presume --disable-werror would avoid the problem ? Yes, it's known that non-standard flags cause spurious warnings so --disable-werror is recommended if you change flags. Richard.
