http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58574
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 30935 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30935&action=edit Alternate fix Another possibility. If the check is there really just to prevent handling tablejumps, I wonder why we can't do the tablejump handling first and only if it didn't do anything, handle all other jumps.
