http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58352
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> --- (In reply to 1zeeky from comment #2) > I am aware that the code is invalid; I'm not saying there shouldn't be an > error. Then I was mislead by your comment: "I'm not 100% sure the attached testcase *should* compile.". I agree that the diagnostics could be improved.
