http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58330
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |powerpc64*-linux Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-09-06 Component|middle-end |target Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think the rs6000 back-end should follow what aarch64 does with respect of the atomic stores and don't use a standard movdi pattern but have an atomic store pattern instead.