http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58276
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Larry Baker from comment #4) > I suppose a different way of asking whether this should be considered a bug > is to ask what should gfortran's behavior be when libgfortran.spec is > missing? Is the correct behavior to continue with the link step as though > libgfortran.spec were empty? Which, I assume, would require the link > command to specify all its libraries explicitly. > > Do you think this is really just gfortran being overly picky? No it is not being overly picky as there is no library to link against when it comes to the link stage so it complains about libgfortran.spec being missing which itself describes how to link.
