http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5) > Ok, that makes sense, it simply means that on darwin, at variance with > Linux, for -m32 a size_t is an unsigned long instead of an unsigned int, we > can simply apply the patchlet and close the issue. > > Next time, please say more clearly in which *exact* condition the FAIL > appears. ack, the patchlet fixes it as expected.
