http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53705

Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0)
> Created attachment 27640 [details]
> reduced testcase (from testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c)
> 
> GCC 4.3-4.8 fails, while with GCC 4.2, the code is reduced just to return 0.
> I am not sure if this should be marked as a regression.
> 
> Compiler output:
> $ gcc -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fpeel-loops -fsched2-use-superblocks
> -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-web --param=max-completely-peel-times=256
> testcase.c
> $ ./a.out
> Aborted
> 
> Looking at the assembly:
> ...
>       sub     rsp, 320        #,
>       mov     rdx, QWORD PTR p[rip]   # p.0, p
>       lea     rcx, [rbp-320]  # q,
> ...
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+240], rdi        # *q_19, tmp73
>       lea     rax, [rdx+144]  # tmp73,
>       lea     rsi, [rdx+148]  # tmp73,
>       lea     rdi, [rdx+152]  # tmp73,
>       lea     rdx, [rdx+156]  # tmp73,
>       cmp     QWORD PTR [rbp-8], rdx  # q, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+280], rax        # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+248], r8 # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+256], r9 # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+264], r10        # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+272], r11        # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+288], rsi        # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+296], rdi        # *q_19, tmp73
>       mov     QWORD PTR [rcx+304], rdx        # *q_19, tmp73
>       jne     .L46    #,
> ...
> It seems the dependency between storing to *q++ (esp. q[39]) in foo() and
> verifying it in main() is lost. Furthermore, it seems q[39] ([rcx+312]) is
> not stored to at all.

I can't reproduce the unrolling with an i686-pc-linux-gnu X x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
compiler, neither for 4.8.2 20130729 (prerelease) , nor for 4.9.0 20130729
(experimental) sources.

Is that an issuse with the cross-compiler, or with the compiler version?

Reply via email to