http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57714
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #11) > Could you either not suggest that the current behaviour is a bug (even if it > is a minor one) in the FAQ, or change the documentation so that it is > unspecified what that code preprocesses to? Good observation. Feel free to edit the wiki to match the documentation. Changing the documentation is less trivial, but if you think that is a better option, you could submit a patch.
