http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5) > > That would be fine. But it seems less important for member functions, since > there's much less chance of a local variable name conflicting with some > random function declared by an #include file. Well, Jan here is complaining precisely that a local variable (not function pointer, not other function) conflicts with a member function. I would expect that to almost never happen but I guess some programmers are not very good at naming things ;-)
