http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57323

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You are wrong.  When you overload operator &&, you cause the order of execution
of the two sides to become unspecified just like any function call arguments or
any non-short-cut operation in C++.

Reply via email to