http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57323
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You are wrong. When you overload operator &&, you cause the order of execution of the two sides to become unspecified just like any function call arguments or any non-short-cut operation in C++.