http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57139
Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler at
| |googlemail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com>
2013-05-06 11:35:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Good point. Sadly, is_convertible is not equivalent to implicit convertibility
> exactly due to that additional requirement (not sure if the latter is
> intentional, or an StdLib defect).
If at all this would be a core-language defect.
> Does the paper you mention address std::tuple or std::is_convertible?
The paper addresses std::tuple and std::pair. I don't see how the Library could
change std::is_convertible, because it does exactly what the core language
semantics require. The document number will be N3680 in the post-meeting
mailing.
