http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Wrongly rejects a generic |Matching host-associated
|call because it doesn't |generic vs. same-named
|match the intrinsic while |use-associated generic
|another specific matches |
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-30
16:44:36 UTC ---
For clarification:
- ABS and SIZE are both generic names, either having an intrinsic and a user
specific procedure.
- In "sub", the specific functions of "SIZE" do not match the rejected calls.
- The specific functions of "ABS" do match - and both have the same generic
name
See:
USE MOO, ONLY: RENAME => ABS
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE SUB
USE MOO, ONLY: RENAME => SIZE, T
Thus, the question is whether the generic "rename" are merged or whether the
inner "rename" overrides the host-associated "rename".
If they are merged, the question is how ambiguity is handled.
