http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57022
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-21 21:25:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I have an extended patch which fixes both this one and the original test > > case > > (and regtests cleanly). > > Does it also fix PR 53685 comment 7? Yes, in fact it does (although I wasn't aware of that PR up to now). Just posted the patch at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00198.html
