http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56928
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12
08:40:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Visiting PHI node: dynamic_3 = PHI <0(2), dynamic_2(11)>
>
> Argument #0 (2 -> 5 executable)
> 0
> Value: [0, 0]
>
> Argument #1 (11 -> 5 executable)
> dynamic_2
> Value: [0, 1]
> Meeting
> [0, 0]
> and
> [0, 1]
> to
> [0, 1]
> Found new range for dynamic_3: [0, +INF(OVF)]
>
>
> I don't see any overflow there or even a way to cause the overflow.
>
> Looks like there is a bad type issue, dynamic is char but it is being treated
> as a boolean type internally.
No, it's the usual case of a back-edge where to cut-off iteration we
increase all the way to +-INF(OVF). This is a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 49234 ***
