http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-03-26
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[4.7/4.8] |Recursive call goes through
|[missed-optimization] |the PLT unnecessarily
|Recursive call goes through |
|the PLT unnecessarily |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-26
14:26:21 UTC ---
Confirmed. We don't optimize callgraph cycles with one externally visible
entry that way. And I believe we currently have no way of annotating a
single call to resolve locally. Honza?
