http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-22 09:59:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) > In case this won't be fixed in 4.6, then it is probably good to set the status > to WONTFIX so people know that they have to deal with this on their own. It looks like I missed this backport when I did it earlier - I'll look into a backport over the weekend. Thanks, Ramana