http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308



--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 
2013-03-22 09:59:47 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #26)

> In case this won't be fixed in 4.6, then it is probably good to set the status

> to WONTFIX so people know that they have to deal with this on their own.



It looks like I missed this backport when I did it earlier - I'll look into a

backport over the weekend.





Thanks,

Ramana

Reply via email to