http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2013-02-14 18:00:57 UTC --- Sorry, but wouldn't that be "papering over bugs"? I'm confounded by the attitude around bootstrap failures, regardless of the basic supported options being used: -O3 with LTO and profile-use. This combination has been in use in 3 different companies I have worked with, since 4.6.x. If it's not a supported configuration to the point where an FSF GCC release can't bootstrap itself consistently without wrong-code/diagnostic false positives, then I'll just plan on sticking to vendor branches -- something I don't want to do since I would prefer not to have another EGCS situation. Let me know how to proceed with these classes of issues.
