http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56296



--- Comment #2 from Balazs Kilvady <kilvadyb at homejinni dot com> 2013-02-12 
12:12:22 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #1)

> Why do you think this is a bug?  If a target doesn't support atomic operations

> on certain variable sizes, this is what you get, you are out of luck with

> atomicity in that case.  In GCC 4.8 you can use libatomic which will provide

> emulation for that case using locks (though, of course, in that case all

> accesses to the var need to be done using atomic builtins).



Thank you for the quick reply.

Reply via email to