http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56251
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-08 22:09:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Note, this is a const static member, the initialization is the definition, > if I don't initialize it, I would get an "Undefined symbol" linking error. > This code is valid. No, the code is invalid but a diagnostic is not required by the standard which is why it is accepted.
