http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56250



--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-08 
01:51:39 UTC ---

When I do this:

         unsigned x = 2;

         unsigned t = (x/2);

         unsigned t1 = -t;

         unsigned t2 = t2/2;



t2 is 0 which is correct.  I don't see why 2147483647 is correct.

Reply via email to