http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-05 11:26:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > bug in SPEC, it would be much better to just report it to SPEC and hope they > fix it up. Though given http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/Docs/faq.html#Run.05 I > don't have much hope they will (when they even don't see it as C89 violation). Ah, in this case it is actually the same bug.
