http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56142



--- Comment #2 from Ray Lauff <ray at temple dot edu> 2013-01-30 03:26:23 UTC 
---

You are correct, of course.  Thank you for the pointer, which led me to a

successful build.



ray





On Jan 29, 2013, at 6:05 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:



> left brace in texi2pod.pl, line 319

> 

> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:04:53 +0000

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Reason: Reporter

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Type: changed

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---

> 

> X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 

> 

> Message-ID: <bug-56142-22822-ysnpoxi...@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

> 

> In-Reply-To: <bug-56142-22...@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

> 

> References: <bug-56142-22...@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

> 

> X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

> 

> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

> 

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> 

> MIME-Version: 1.0

> 

> 

> 

> 

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56142

> 

> 

> 

> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-29 
> 23:04:53 UTC ---

> 

>> checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in

> 

>> `/usr/local/src/gcc/objdir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc':

> 

>> configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

> 

> 

> 

> This issue is not caused by the perl warning message.  Please look into

> 

> config.log in /usr/local/src/gcc/objdir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc to see

> 

> what the failure is.  Most likely you don't have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set 
> correctly.

> 

> 

> 

> -- 

> 

> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

> 

> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

> 

> You reported the bug.

Reply via email to