http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-20 18:35:20 UTC --- Yeah, I'm afraid assuming you never do 1 << 31 is going to break simply way too much code in the wild.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-20 18:35:20 UTC --- Yeah, I'm afraid assuming you never do 1 << 31 is going to break simply way too much code in the wild.