http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55971
--- Comment #2 from Nach <nachms+gcc at gmail dot com> 2013-01-14 15:47:25 UTC --- Does look similar. Although this bug here is in the definition of the macro, while that bug is in the call of the macro. I'm sure they're related, but it'd be a shame if one was fixed, and the other was overlooked.
