http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55836
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-01
00:09:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 29066 [details]
> Self-contained source file
>
> When using -Weffc++ with this code
>
> class Foo : public std::list<int> { };
>
> the compiler warns that the base class "has a non-virtual destructor". While
> this is true, there is not much one can do about it.
Why not just not use -Weffc++ for STL. effc++ warnings are written from a book
and they don't always make sense really.
> If the compiler were to set a pre-processor variable when -Weffc++ is in
> effect, adding virtual destructors could be made conditional.
Then it would violate the one definition rule.
