http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-19 16:39:56 UTC --- I guess a problem of such approach is if not in libgcov.a and HOST_WIDE_INT is smaller than long long (or for clz even not exactly 64-bit). For popcount, I wonder why the code uses __builtin_popcountll at all, when the value is unsigned int, it should just use __builtin_popcount and I think we can safely assume that HOST_WIDE_INT is at least as wide as int. So just using either popcount_hwi or __builtin_popcount (no ll) should be fine. For clz, there is: if (v > 0) r = 63 - __builtin_clzll (v); i.e. it relies on clzll having exactly 64-bit argument. For __builtin_clzll perhaps the assumption is fine, for clz_hwi not so. So you need some extra code to implement clz_ll on top of clz_hwi if HWI is smaller than 64-bit.