http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #25 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-19 10:32:29 UTC --- >> So, to fix this, either libasan should for memset ignore any diagnostics for >> stores into shadow memory area, That's not a good choice. I remember actually catching a bug or two when a program was reading wild addresses and hitting the shadow. >> or I'll need to force somehow that memset is never generated for it, This is imho the best choice. >> or we could have a non-instrumented memset alternative in libasan and we >> could call that. That's doable too, although it will look strange and I'd prefer to avoid this.
