http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-10
12:10:41 UTC ---
Is this slower compared to pre-r186530 gfortran, or just from the r186530
through 187339? I think before that change on this testcase we've vectorized
just 25 loops, not 28 loops as now, and supposedly the loops for which the
r187340 change is a problem are only those that weren't vectorized before at
all. If the latter, then this wouldn't be a regression.
Is there an easy way to detect if peeling could turn a simple_iv vectorized
load into non-!simple_iv?
Michael, do you plan to work on this?
