http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233
--- Comment #6 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com <richard.guenther at gmail dot com> 2012-12-05 09:23:56 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:35 PM, matt at use dot net <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233 > > --- Comment #5 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2012-12-04 20:35:09 > UTC --- > ping? if you're more comfortable with relegating multiple passes to LTO, I > think that's a good starting point. we can wait for a per-unit C++ template > case to come up after that's in. Yes, multiple LTO passes is what I think should be done (or alternatively if one really dislikes this better processing of cgraph SCCs during early optimizations like I outlined in some e-mail response to the original patches). But the LTO approach should be more powerful anyway. > is there anything you'd like me to do to get this moving again? Produce patches for review? ;)
