http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-04
16:41:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> OK, what value it should be? We always used error_mark_node with this meaning
> both in LTO and cgraph.
Dunno, I'm leaning towards just not dropping anything for -g.
> static int a[]={huge sequence of numbers};
> In C++ we have a lot of class constructors and vtables that comes from headers
> and can go away...
But that should be perfectly expressable in DWARF4, if we don't express it
right now, we just should.
