http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-04 09:27:54 UTC --- > So it's up to the only one in this discussion who does *not* have a paid > GCC hacking position to fix this? Has Itanium really sunk so deep? It's up to the author of the suspected patch to do something. I personally monitor the status of the IA-64 port on a regular basis, but we're supposed to have maintainers to do it, although they seem to be in the MIPS business now. I can provide IA-64 testing cycles, but I don't really have time to debug the scheduler when I haven't broken it. > I'm having a look on gcc66. Thanks. I'm going to attach the testsuite results with the patch applied; all the timeouts have been introduced by it.
