http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55540
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski <luto at mit dot edu> 2012-11-29 22:58:44 UTC --- Gack. I'm still at a loss as to where __int128 is coming from. I don't think it's an integral promotion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55540
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski <luto at mit dot edu> 2012-11-29 22:58:44 UTC --- Gack. I'm still at a loss as to where __int128 is coming from. I don't think it's an integral promotion.