http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-18
16:24:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > Thus, I close the bug as INVALID.
> ... in wich case could you, please, update the testcase to be valid and remove
> the XFAIL I introduced?
We jump through some hoops in or DO loop code generation to execute
a loop until HUGE(i) in a way that somebody who did not read the
standard well might expect, but which is actually invalid.
If we do not do this any more, then we can probably simplify our DO
loops considerably.
We should also warn about invalid code in the FE.
