http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #22 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> 2012-11-15 02:46:20 UTC --- Ok, will see if I can submit that one tomorrow then, after double checking the performance. Teresa On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, hubicka at ucw dot cz <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 > > --- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2012-11-15 02:01:01 > UTC --- >> Ok, I can do that. I had tried that but didn't see any gain yet (need >> to take a look at my results again). I have been playing with teasing >> apart the various uses of this cutoff (inlining vs instruction >> selection vs etc) too, but can do that in a later release once the >> appropriate individual cutoffs are tuned. I also have a loop unroller >> patch on the google branch that uses this that needs to be ported to >> trunk. It was in the original working set patch I sent for review, >> that ended up being split out and revised heavily. Shall I resubmit >> this part for 4.8 or is it too late? > > I can't review the unroller change, so you should ask one of the maintainers > of the area. For the hot/cold change, I would really like to see it in. > (and yes, I also plan to use it for more aggressive inlining in known to > be hot areas). > > Honza > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug.
