http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-05 20:23:55 UTC --- Ugliness in cfganal.c, it depends on the block ordering for the DFS it performs on the reverse CFG. The following patch should fix the issue. Index: cfganal.c =================================================================== --- cfganal.c (revision 193181) +++ cfganal.c (working copy) @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ void connect_infinite_loops_to_exit (void) { basic_block unvisited_block = EXIT_BLOCK_PTR; + basic_block deadend_block; struct depth_first_search_dsS dfs_ds; /* Perform depth-first search in the reverse graph to find nodes @@ -467,8 +468,9 @@ connect_infinite_loops_to_exit (void) if (!unvisited_block) break; - make_edge (unvisited_block, EXIT_BLOCK_PTR, EDGE_FAKE); - flow_dfs_compute_reverse_add_bb (&dfs_ds, unvisited_block); + deadend_block = dfs_find_deadend (unvisited_block); + make_edge (deadend_block, EXIT_BLOCK_PTR, EDGE_FAKE); + flow_dfs_compute_reverse_add_bb (&dfs_ds, deadend_block); } flow_dfs_compute_reverse_finish (&dfs_ds); @@ -958,7 +960,7 @@ flow_dfs_compute_reverse_execute (depth_ /* Determine if there are unvisited basic blocks. */ FOR_BB_BETWEEN (bb, last_unvisited, NULL, prev_bb) if (!bitmap_bit_p (data->visited_blocks, bb->index)) - return dfs_find_deadend (bb); + return bb; return NULL; }