http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-11-05 09:16:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > In -O0 case, we broke discovery loop too early, so we can't find all return > > regs. I would argue, that we should ignore non-relevant pseudos with: > > You are right. I was wrong about what is going on that case. Will you submit the patch to gcc-patches, please?
