http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #2 from meanone <meanarbez at gmail dot com> 2012-11-03 11:11:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Compiled with MinGW port of g++, compiles without errors or warnings:
>
> It does warn if you ask it to: -Wall
I can understand that this is ok behavior for C, but to have to
EXPLICITLY ASK typesafe language like C++ to inform me if function
WITH RETURN TYPE does not return anything ?
If this is not bug why shouldn't we make
int n;
n =;
printf("%d",n);
to be legal code, compiler should simply assign whatever it wants. Right ?
Could anyone explain what for should missing return on typical C++ function
be useful at all ?
Not to mention probability that it has been forgotten by mistake.
-Wreturn-type should be set by default.
