http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
--- Comment #30 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-26 11:45:11 UTC --- > > Your "c" example seems like a completely separate issue that should be a > separate PR, I don't understand why it's being discussed here. It is now PR55080. About this PR, I concur now with Jonathan: "My suggestion would be do nothing and lose the PR. If you want a warning in C++98 use -pedantic, which is consistent with other GNU extensions. In C++11 use constexpr."
