http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
--- Comment #3 from mojo at world3 dot net 2012-10-22 12:40:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > And I actually don't understand teh issue: Optimizing for size does not > require > to produce slow code. The code may run fast. -O3 is supposed to produce the fastest possible code, but it doesn't. -Os is faster. At the very least the two should be equal. In other words -O3 is broken.
