http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55018
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-22 09:00:55 UTC --- It's simple - you basically have <bb 2>: if (Connect_5(D) != 0) goto <bb 4>; else goto <bb 5>; <bb 3>: # occurrence_3 = PHI <0(5), occurrence_1(3)> # .MEM_17 = PHI <.MEM_9(D)(5), .MEM_2(3)> occurrence_1 = occurrence_3 + 1; # .MEM_2 = VDEF <.MEM_17> printf ("Sender_Signal occurrence %d \n", occurrence_1); goto <bb 3>; and this invokes undefined behavior because occurrence_1 = occurrence_3 + 1 overflows. Thus GCC is free to do anything. Fixing the testcase doesn't fix the code though: void Sender_signal(int Connect) { unsigned int occurrence = 0; int State = 3; if (Connect) State = 0; start: if (Connect) goto start; occurrence++; if (State != 2) __builtin_printf("Sender_Signal occurrence %u\n", occurrence); goto start; }