http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54686



--- Comment #28 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-09-24 
09:27:05 UTC ---

Indeed uglier ;) but I must say that overall I think we have to do something

like this. I'm still annoyed that because of the type we can't handle in the

same way div but I'm also coming to the conclusion that in terms of actual code

we can't do much about it, besides making the configury more fine grained, and

separating the stdlib.h bits, which maybe could help other targets but, if I

understand correctly, would not help newlib anyway, because llabs is completely

missing

 (Note that around the corner there is us providing fall backs for *everything*

missing from the target libc, where in this case *us* has nothing to do with

*me* ;)

Reply via email to