http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54573

             Bug #: 54573
           Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c
                    execution test
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: h...@gcc.gnu.org
                CC: rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
              Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
            Target: cris-axis-elf


This test previously passed, now it fails.
A patch in the revision range (last_known_working:first_known_failing)
191244:191253 exposed or caused this regression.  Since then it fails as
follows:

Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/dg.exp ...
...
FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test


The messages in gcc.log says that abort() was called:

Executing on host: /tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/xgcc
-B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/ /tmp/hpaut\
otest-gcc0/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c 
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret   -O2   -isystem /tmp/hpautote\
st-gcc0/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./newlib/targ-include -isystem
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/gcc/newlib/libc/include -B/tmp/hpa\
utotest-gcc0/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./libgloss/cris/
-L/tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./libgloss/cris \
-L/tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/gcc/libgloss/cris 
-B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc0/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./newlib/ -L/tmp/hpautotest-g\
cc0/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./newlib -sim3  -lm   -o
./builtin-object-size-8.exe    (timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c (test for excess errors)
program stopped with signal 6.^M
FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

I see this FAIL in messages to gcc-testresults too, for example (x86_64)
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-09/msg01239.html> and (i686)
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-09/msg01225.html> so the regression
seems universal.

Author of only suspect patch in revision range CC:ed.

Reply via email to