http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54498
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-06 09:58:26 UTC --- Let me see. We seem to pick up <bb 2>: REALPART_EXPR <prev_ft._M_value> = 0.0; when optimizing <bb 7>: D.25613_38 = ft._M_value; __r$_M_value = D.25613_38; - D.25615_39 = MEM[(const double &)&prev_ft]; + D.25615_39 = 0.0; possibly not realizing that <bb 3>: prev_ft = ft; clobbers it.